Could it be Love?

 


by Kathy Kinsley
September 27, 2000

 

Was it love? (part 7)

You might wish to read the previous article in this series before reading this one. I had come to Phuket at the invitation of my US business partner, who was living there, just to find he'd married a Thai woman.

I spent a long time trying to understand why either of them would want to marry the other. They had little in common. I understood her reasoning early on, but I'm still not sure about his. She was my age (early forties) and far past the marriageable age for Thai women. She was also getting too old to make much money in the bars, as most of the tourists were interested in the 'young and beautiful' ones. She liked him, and wanted to be married and 'respectable'.

I suppose that isn't too much different from women in the west who convince themselves they are in love. The one thing I found most interesting is that she always said "I love my husband," never "I love Dave". That might or might not have been a language/culture difference, I did hear it from some others. I believe she did care for him in some ways, and had convinced herself that she loved him.

Dave was quite certain he loved her, but looking from the outside, I think he was more obsessed than loving. The two of them fought constantly, and made it up passionately.

All in all, I'd say they each needed the other. Her attitude was a fairly pragmatic one, it was (for her) better to be a wife than to be a bargirl. Survival was her concern. She'd led a pretty hard life, and having a man to support her was a big priority. Even though he wasn't rich, he was far better off than she was. She also had (as most Asians) the obligation to send money to her family, and a source of steady income was important.

Dave I'm still not sure about, I'd known him for about eight years, worked closely with him. I thought I understood him, but I suspect I was wrong. I think he was looking for someone to take care of him. Maybe a surrogate mama. I saw that aspect in a lot of the men there. The women fit well into the "traditional wife" role, and most of the men seemed to be looking for a mother more than a wife. They wanted someone to cook and clean house and do the laundry, and send the boys out to play -- no worries, no responsibilities.

I'm adding a disclaimer here due to a comment I just got. I have no problems about the stay-at-home wife (or stay-at-home husband) — especially one with children. I do have very serious objections when I get the impression that someone is in the market for a stay-at-home spouse because they want a servant. I especially object when the person involved wants that spouse to stay at home alone all the time while they go out to play with the 'boys' almost every night.

I don't think the Thai women are submissive in any sense of the word. They just consider the work they do to be work. They work at home when they can. As in most countries, in the poorer families, both men and women work outside -- the 'traditional wife' is more fantasy than reality. But they consider housework to be their job, and they expect to be paid for it, with the husband's paycheque.

Many a foreign man looking for a Thai wife has been appalled when the woman immediately started discussing money. But that's the deal. Even in a Thai to Thai marriage, money is a big part of marriage negotiations. It's the man that pays. Thai culture is a bride-price culture, unlike the West, which is a dowry culture. A Thai man who marries essentially buys his bride, or his family does (the wife's family often pays this back with housing help and suchlike).

In the 'old days' in the west, if there was any money paid over a marriage, it was usually the bride's father who gave the new husband a dowry. In Thailand it is the opposite. I've heard people compare it to slavery (you are buying the woman?) but it's really more a way for the potential husband to prove that he's a good provider and that he values her.

In many Thai families, the man comes home and hands over his pay cheque. The woman runs the family finances, and the man gets his spending money from his wife. Needless to say, this goes over like a lead balloon with most western men. Including Dave! Many of the fights between the two of them were over money.

The rest of them were over her suspecting him of frequenting bar girls. To my knowledge, he didn't, but she didn't trust him out of her sight unless I was along (which attitude only added to the rumours I mentioned in the previous article). She was a bar girl when he met her, and I think she was worried he might find another he liked better.

He, in fact, denied to me for several months that she had been a bar girl. She had told me, and he knew that, but he still denied it. He was denying it more to himself than to me. In my opinion, that isn't love -- he couldn't accept what she had been, and wanted to make up a fantasy life for her. She was more honest, she hadn't liked what she'd done, but it had been necessary for her survival, and she wasn't ashamed of it.

So -- in answer to that question I posed. No, I don't think it was love on either part, not by the way I define love. It might well fit other people's definitions though. I've often thought many people say "I love" when they mean "I need", and they did need each other.

If anyone is interested... they are presently separated, fairly amicably, and still in contact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com